TL;DR
Get sports gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Nicole Noren, a longtime ESPN investigative producer, told Columbia Journalism Review that she left the network because of its expanding sports-betting business. She cited her family’s experience with gambling addiction and said she had pitched reporting on gambling companies and addiction that was not approved. ESPN’s current partnership with DraftKings and the full circumstances of Noren’s departure are not detailed in the interview.
Nicole Noren, a former ESPN producer, says she left the network after 24 years because its expanding involvement in sports betting conflicted with her experience of gambling addiction in her family. In an interview with Columbia Journalism Review, she described ESPN’s shift toward betting partnerships as the point at which she decided she could no longer work there.
Noren said ESPN’s decision to license its name to the ESPN Bet app in 2023 was the last straw. “I was out,” she told CJR. “I’m not going to work for a gambling company and have blood on my hands.” ESPN Bet was later replaced by a partnership with DraftKings, according to the report. In March, the companies enabled customers to link their ESPN and DraftKings accounts.
Noren worked mainly on Outside the Lines, ESPN’s investigative newsmagazine, and spent 24 years at the network. She said she had pitched stories examining gambling companies and addiction, but those proposals were not approved. She also told CJR that a program on the subject was eventually produced, but in her view the final version was less forceful than some contributors had intended.
Her objections are grounded in her account of her family’s history. Noren said her grandfather, father and one brother experienced serious problems with sports gambling. She described repeated moves during her childhood because of financial instability and said her brother died at 36 in Las Vegas, after living on the streets. “Addiction dictated every part of our life,” she told CJR.
A Producer’s Conflict Over Betting
Noren’s account puts a personal and newsroom dimension on the growth of sports-betting partnerships at a major sports broadcaster. The issue she raises is not only whether a network can carry betting promotions, but whether its commercial relationships affect its willingness to scrutinize gambling companies and addiction.
Her interview is one former employee’s account, not an independent finding that ESPN suppressed coverage or that its betting promotions caused harm. Still, Noren’s position in the network’s investigative unit and her description of unapproved pitches make her concerns relevant to questions about editorial independence when a media company also has business ties to the industry it covers.
The stakes extend to audiences who encounter betting content alongside sports coverage. Noren argued that ESPN’s role as a trusted guide to sports could help make gambling feel routine. The interview does not establish the scale of any resulting harm, but it records a former producer’s stated concern about how that normalization may affect people vulnerable to addiction.
sports betting addiction help book
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
ESPN’s Shift Toward Betting
The CJR report traces ESPN’s change in approach to the years after the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban on sports betting in 2018. In 2019, then-Disney chief executive Bob Iger told investors he did not see the company getting involved in gambling “in the near term.” The report says ESPN’s stance later softened as sports betting became more widely promoted across sports media.
ESPN licensed its name to ESPN Bet in 2023. CJR reported that the arrangement was expected to generate $1.5 billion over 10 years; the report also characterized the app as an embarrassing flop. ESPN subsequently partnered with DraftKings, whose advertising appears across ESPN coverage, according to CJR. The companies’ account-linking arrangement was described in a press release as going beyond a traditional marketing deal.
Noren also told CJR that she noticed the boundary between business and editorial becoming less firm about five to seven years before the interview. She said reporting on stories involving business stakeholders became harder for her investigative colleagues. That is her assessment of newsroom conditions; the interview does not provide internal records or a response from ESPN addressing her specific allegations.
“I don’t see the Walt Disney Company, certainly in the near term, getting involved in the business of gambling, in effect, by facilitating gambling in any way.”
— Bob Iger, then Disney chief executive, speaking to investors in 2019, as quoted by CJR
Questions About ESPN’s Newsroom
The interview does not give Noren’s final day or departure date, nor does it establish whether ESPN responded to her claims about pitches that were not approved or reporting that was softened. CJR’s account presents her perspective; the material provided does not include comment from ESPN or DraftKings addressing her allegations.
It is also unclear how much influence the betting partnerships had on specific editorial decisions, whether ESPN has formal safeguards separating advertising from reporting, or what evidence supports a direct link between the network’s promotions and gambling-related harm. Noren’s family history and concerns are her own account, not a measurement of the partnerships’ effects on viewers.
Scrutiny of Betting Coverage
The immediate next step is any response from ESPN to Noren’s account, particularly her statements about proposed investigations and editorial independence. The interview does not announce a pending review, policy change or new reporting project by ESPN.
ESPN’s partnership with DraftKings remains relevant to the story because the companies have enabled customers to link their accounts, according to CJR. Further developments to watch include changes to that arrangement, how ESPN presents betting content, and whether the network provides more information about its separation of commercial partnerships from editorial decisions.
Key Questions
Who is Nicole Noren?
Nicole Noren is a former ESPN producer who worked at the network for 24 years, mainly on the investigative program Outside the Lines. She spoke about her departure in an interview with Columbia Journalism Review.
Why did Noren say she left ESPN?
Noren said ESPN’s increasing promotion of sports betting, including its 2023 ESPN Bet deal, conflicted with her concerns about gambling addiction and her family’s experience. She described ESPN Bet as the last straw.
What did Noren allege about ESPN’s coverage?
She said she pitched stories examining gambling companies and addiction that were not approved, and that a program on the subject was less hard-hitting than some people involved had wanted. These are Noren’s statements; the source material does not include an ESPN response.
What is ESPN’s relationship with DraftKings?
According to CJR, ESPN’s ESPN Bet arrangement was replaced by a partnership with DraftKings. The report says the companies later enabled customers to link their ESPN and DraftKings accounts.
Has ESPN confirmed Noren’s account?
The source material does not include a confirmation or response from ESPN. The claims about newsroom decisions and the reasons for Noren’s departure are attributed to her in the CJR interview.
Source: hn
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
